<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Writing on Dave Marquard</title><link>https://marquard.org/posts/</link><description>Recent content in Writing on Dave Marquard</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 09:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://marquard.org/posts/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Six months building an agentic OS. What it changed about how I think about product orgs.</title><link>https://marquard.org/posts/agentic-os-six-months/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 09:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://marquard.org/posts/agentic-os-six-months/</guid><description>Six months operating my work life inside an agentic OS changed how I think about evals, unit economics, the gap between a demo and a system, and the shape of a product org. Four shifts, with the rubrics, failure modes, and forcing functions to back them up.</description></item><item><title>The "we have AI" moat is gone. Ad tech sells outcomes pricing next.</title><link>https://marquard.org/posts/ai-moat-gone/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 09:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://marquard.org/posts/ai-moat-gone/</guid><description>Three signals in one week — Gemini Omni, DeepSeek&amp;rsquo;s permanent 75% price cut, and the FTC&amp;rsquo;s first AI-targeting enforcement action — collapse the &amp;ldquo;we have ML&amp;rdquo; pitch as a defensible position. The next moat in ad tech is outcomes pricing, and the buy side is finally asking for it.</description></item></channel></rss>